[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#648057: marked as done (tasksel: please include laptop-mode-tools in the laptop task selection)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:53:35 +0530
with message-id <4EBB7BF7.8060806@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#648057: tasksel: please include laptop-mode-tools in the laptop task selection
has caused the Debian Bug report #648057,
regarding tasksel: please include laptop-mode-tools in the laptop task selection
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
648057: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648057
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: tasksel
Version: 3.07
Severity: wishlist

laptop-mode-tools is a power saving tool for linux. It would be good to
see laptop-mode-tools installed when a user selects the "Laptop" task.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages tasksel depends on:
ii  aptitude                0.6.4-1.2
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.41   
ii  liblocale-gettext-perl  1.05-7   
ii  perl                    5.12.4-6 
ii  tasksel-data            3.07     

tasksel recommends no packages.

tasksel suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
  tasksel/title:
  tasksel/desktop: gnome
  tasksel/first: SSH server, Laptop, Standard system utilities
  tasksel/tasks:

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 11/09/2011 11:14 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Ritesh Raj Sarraf (rrs@debian.org):
>> Only pm-utils does power savings. And so does lmt. Others are reporting
>> tools or tools that can trigger.
> 
> 
> So, that sumamrizes to:  in what is lmt better than pm-utils? I have
> no specific problem with either of these, but it's certainly not a
> good idea to install both..:-)
> 
> 

There are many users using lmt. I got an email from a user saying he
selected Laptop in tasksel and expected to see lmt installed.

Given that there are many power management tools, it should be okay to
have one (pm-utils) as the default. Also pm-utils has a way higher
install base.

Closing this bug report.


-- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: