[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#640377: debian-installer: /usr partition is too small, even on hugh hard disk



reassign 640377 partman-auto
thanks

Quoting Witold Baryluk (baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl):
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hi.
> 
> I am normally using FAI to installing Debian boxes,
> but I was evaluating migration to amd64 from i386,
> so needed some more control. Mostly applications
> (some are i386 only), and some user testing if
> everything is OK.
> 
> I done this manually using squeezy installer,
> as our FAI box is configured to serve i386 Debian,
> and I do not see any easy way to have both
> i386 and amd64 on the same FAI machine.
> 
> I just wanted to do this quickly so used squeeze biarch
> DVD. I also just used "guided partitioning".
> 
> It is similar to the #575914 bug
> ( debian-installer: cannot resize partitions after "guided partitioning" step )
> 
> 
> So, I have 250GB SATA disk, and automatic partitioning
> with multiple partitions ended with /usr having 8.3GB (df -h).
> 
> I rebooted, and started installing sofware with apt-get.
> 
> I was in the middle of installing software (everything from
> normal Debian repositories), when /usr space
> run out. I comparred to the other boxes, and most use about 12GB
> of space in /usr.
> 
> It is not really big installation, just a workstation software,
> full gnome, kde, xfce, openoffice, few other important software,
> multiple compilers and development libraries.
> Inspecting packages on other machines,
> we have about 3000-3380 packages installed.
> We have list of packages which are automatically installed
> by FAI, and I was using exactly same list.
> http://smp.if.uj.edu.pl/~baryluk/fai/KOLO_WS
> 
> I guess, this 8GB /usr partition is some kind
> of celling in the debian-installer, but 14GB will be much
> better for really big HDDs, especially if someone
> wants to install both kde and gnome, and still wants 1-2 GB
> for things like Mathematica or Quake 3 in /usr/local. :)
> 
> User will be safe, if he/she puts everything on single partition,
> or separate /home probably, but when he/she choose
> separate /var, /usr and /tmp, he will have trouble.
> 
> I just checked recipes/multi file in the
> git://anonscm.debian.org/d-i/partman-auto.git
> and it says 9000 MB is the max for /usr
> 
> I think we can assume amd64 is new enough,
> and user have quite big hard disk. (at least on amd64).
> 
> Actully I find that not so long ago (Oct 2010),
> in commit b639042b331dc, changed /usr
> from 6000MB to 9000MB.
> 
> Previous change was from 5000MB to 6000MB,
> in May 2010 in commit 0cfe282142e2905.
> 
> I know 14GB may sound like huge jump from 9GB.
> So, I think limiting this to amd64, and maybe some
> additional small logic (like having at least 200GB free
> space used for autopartitioning), should solve it.
> 
> I inspected serveral different machines installed
> by me, desktops, laptops, installed manually,
> or using FAI. And 12GB used in /usr was almost
> on all of them. Some machines used about 14GB,
> because for example of Mathematica or Intel Compiler.
> 
> It is also good to slightly over-estimate size, as
> over-estimating doesn't hurt much (maybe other partition
> will have smaller size), in the oposition to under
> estimating size. Also having /usr filled too much
> will make it highly fragmented, thus drastically
> decressing performance and boot+login speed.
> 
> Also people who use multi parition profile,
> tend to be a) wanting server, b) wanting
> workstation used by multiple people, c)
> desktop or laptop of advanced user, which
> likes to experiment.
> 
> In cases 2 and 3 in most situations, we will need
> quite big /usr space needs, in range about 12-14GB
> range.
> 
> Other aspect is LVM. On LVM it is much smaller issue,
> as one can increase file system by borowing space
> from other logical volume. However, I always
> find that I decress /home LV, and give some more
> room for /usr, not always just after installation,
> but it always happen, even if I was partitioning
> disk manually. By making defaults bigger we can
> avoid that, and we will not waste space anyway,
> as user still can use LVM to do the reverse
> (decress size of /usr, and give it to /var or /home, etc).
> Reverse however is less probably, it will also
> make underlaying partition extents of /usr, be
> more continous on the disk, thus also improving
> seek times and file system layout.
> 
> Another reason is that amd64 binaries tends to be slightly
> larger than i386 (about 10%), and that gcc 4.6 recently often
> produces bigger object files (depending on flags).
> Actually ia64 architecture would see biggest
> benefit from this change, binaries there are 2.1x bigger
> on avarage (sometimes more) than on i386 or amd64.
> ia64 have currently only 7000 MB in /usr in multi partition scheme,
> by default, combining it with much bigger object files,
> it would be good to increase it. Other archs, could also
> have similar problem, but probably only alpha and sparc64,
> are reasonable candidates.
> 
> Here is good, representative example
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/links
> which shows how installed package size varies
> beetwen arcitectures. This pattern is common
> for lots of binary packages.
> 
> 
> tl;dr: Increase default maximal size of /usr to 13GB
> on amd64, kfreebsd-amd64 and ia64
> 
> Still would be good to have #575914 fixed, one could
> adjust partition sizes after autopartitioning assigned
> sizes automatically.
> 


There's some time now that nobody revisited partman-auto
defaults. Something should probably be done. Volunteers welcome..:-)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: