Quoting Robert Edmonds (email@example.com): > Christian PERRIER wrote: > > To Robert: thanks for the patches and the finally fruitful discussion > > with Matthew (it started a little bit hot but you guys managed to > > handle it. That deserves applauses). > > here is a new version of the patch. this one makes the reachability > test conditional on !is_wireless_iface(), since wireless interfaces > don't have the 802.1d forwarding delay problem. What is the current status of this change. It seems to me that the later discussion was more about choosing a "decent" timeout value than the real involved change. So, would it be possible to commit the proposed change? As Matthew now clearly leads netcfg development, I suggest leaving him the final word on this.
Description: Digital signature