Bug#416378: marked as done (etch-installer suggests wrong gateway address (outside the net) if netmask is different from /24)
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:46:04 +1100
with message-id <20110131004604.GV3684@hezmatt.org>
and subject line Bug#416378: installer suggests invalid gateway
has caused the Debian Bug report #416378,
regarding etch-installer suggests wrong gateway address (outside the net) if netmask is different from /24
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
416378: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=416378
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: etch-installer suggests wrong gateway address (outside the net) if netmask is different from /24
- From: Sven Kloe <sk@net-lab.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:46:17 +0200
- Message-id: <200703271346.17841.sk@net-lab.net>
Package: installation-reports
Version: etch-install CD from 22.03.2007
If you install etch and your computer is for example in a 10.0.0.64/26 network you enter the following:
IP: 10.0.0.66
Netmask: 255.255.255.192
Then the debian installer suggests the following gateway address:
Gateway 10.0.0.1
which is outside the network.
The installer should check for the first address in the network and use this as recommendation.
This error occurs with the debian-etch install CD1 from 22 March 2007
--
Sven Kloe
net-lab GmbH | Frankfurter Str. 99 | 63067 Offenbach
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Andreas John | AG Offenbach, HRB40832
Tel: +49 69 8570033-1 | Fax: -2 | http://www.net-lab.net
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I'm closing this bug, since I cannot reproduce it, I feel that the problem
doesn't exist in the current installer, and requests for further information
have gone unanswered.
If you can reproduce this problem with a current installer release, please
reopen this bug with the relevant information.
- Matt
--- End Message ---
Reply to: