[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#314307: marked as done (bug on debian-installer rc3 - creating raid)



Your message dated Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:01:55 +0000
with message-id <1294786915.3497.34.camel@eeepc.Belkin>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #314307,
regarding bug on debian-installer rc3 - creating raid
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
314307: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314307
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-installer
Version: rc3

Well, I am using the debian-installer to build several RAID 0 volumes,
one for each mount point (/, /home, /tmp, /opt, /usr and /var) with
two disks, wich are exactly the same. The problem I am facing is that
after building the RAID 0 volume, it doesn't become avaliable to me to
use it as a mount point.

I discovered that the devices (/dev/md*), even if the module was
loaded (seems to be loaded on demand during the partitioning stage),
weren't being created. So, I created them by hand using mknod, and
them the installer went perfectly.


-- 
Eduardo Costa Lisboa


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

Thanks for your report.
Closing as it's an installation report from Sarge which isn't supported
anymore.
Feel free to test and report any issues against the current debian
installer release (Squeeze RC1) which supports more hardware and also
it's improved.
Thanks!

http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_rc1/


-- 
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,

Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org



--- End Message ---

Reply to: