Quoting Julien Cristau (firstname.lastname@example.org): > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:58:11 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > $ grep -c '??' debian/po/*|grep -v :0 > > debian/po/fa.po:122 > > Should be restored. > > > debian/po/he.po:47 > > Restored minus one string. > > > debian/po/is.po:118 > > This doesn't seem to be in a bug report, so I don't know where to find > the original file. > > > debian/po/pa.po:162 > > Same, as is.po, I can't find it. Of crap, probably both were sent to me directly (happens with some translators...). I see that you uploaded today to fix what you could fix. I'll try to reupload something else if I can dig out the latest versions of everything. Sadly, none of the automated tests I had up to now were able to detect such error. I'll add something like "grep '??' foo.po" in my local PO file test script to avoid this in the future (unnless mutt is soon fixed).
Description: Digital signature