[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Recurrent "old builds" for D-I

Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaudenz@debian.org):
> Excerpts from Otavio Salvador's message of Don Jan 06 12:32:20 +0100 2011:
> > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 04:01, Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org> wrote:
> > > Goal: stop having a daily mail about failed builds as....this just
> > > makes everybody ignore them after a few days.
> > 
> > We might try to have this mail reversed sorted by failure date. So the
> > most recent failure will always be show at first item.
> > 
> > Another thing we might have is a mail, for the arch, on the day of
> > failure and a summary in weekly basis.
> > 
> > Comments?
> In principle I agree to both. The problem is that this probably means
> that the current scripts have to be rewritten from scratch. As I'm not
> really a Perl Hacker and prefer Python. Would anybody oppose if
> I'd do this in Python?

I wouldn't call this a priority.

The current concern is more having the builds that are supposed to

Rewriting the scripts may be nice but they're doing their job, after

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: