[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#599115: marked as done (debian-installer: grub's target examples still reflect grub-legacy's behavior)

Your message dated Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:19:50 +0000
with message-id <1294359590.2683.2.camel@eeepc.Belkin>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #599115,
regarding debian-installer: grub's target examples still reflect grub-legacy's behavior
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

599115: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599115
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal

using the mini.iso to install sid, choosing expert install (KDE), when getting to the install grub part, after refusing MBR, the examples for (hdx,y) reflect grub legacy behavior.
following example line saying that (hd0,4) is the first virtual partition on first HD, I installed to (hd0,5) resulting in istallation to the first instead of second (intended) virtual partition.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
DISCLAIMER: This mail message was scanned for malicious content by Quality Bytes Mail Security when leaving the gateway of Kibbutz Hazorea

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
fixed in grub-installer 1.58
See #581687

Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,

Miguel Figueiredo

--- End Message ---

Reply to: