On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:47:29 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > In this mail some more specific issues I noticed while testing/reviewing. > > I'm saving the switch to console-setup for a last separate reply. > > On Monday 08 February 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > libx11 > > Is /usr/share/X11/locale needed? If it is, could some of its contents be > excluded because they are not relevant for G-I? I don't think it can be removed completely, but as I said in another reply it can most likely be stripped down. gtk doesn't use the X input method by default, which means that the compose tables go unused, e.g. Not sure how to do the stripping down in a maintainable way yet, but that can probably be figured out. :) [...] > > udev (maybe a single udeb could be sufficient) > > I suppose the additions really are unavoidable? > Pretty much. > The problem with the current patch is that udev-udeb depends on the new > libudev-udeb and will thus also get pulled into regular installer images > and increase their size. > > So I'd prefer to concentrate all bits that are only needed for G-I to be > combined in a separate udeb (udev-gtk-udeb?) and leave the existing > udev-udeb unchanged. udev-gtk-udeb should then depend on udev-udeb and one > of the xorg udebs should depend on udev-gtk-udeb. > Hopefully that's acceptable for Marco. > Fair enough. (The udev bit depending on libudev is /lib/udev/input_id, which basically tells X what the input devices are.) > Point of attention is whether we want the persistent input rules to get > copied to the installed system (as we already do for persistent net > rules). > The persistent-input rules are static, there's no runtime addition of new rules, so that shouldn't be necessary. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature