[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: unused and removable partman templates



I've checked only by grepping, nothing fancy.

On Wednesday 27 January 2010, Joey Hess wrote:
> AFAICS, the following templates are all not used anywhere:
>
> partman-jfs/check_failed
> partman-reiserfs/check_failed
> partman-ext3/check_failed
> partman-ext2r0/check_failed
> partman-xfs/check_failed

(and p-btrfs...)

Still looks to be used for partman-ext2r0 (check.d/check_ext2r0: 32-37), 
but maybe that could be converted to the generic one?

> Similarly, there are generic
> partman-basicfilesystems/progress_checking, create_failed,
> specify_mountpoint, no_mount_point, and these are unused:
>
> partman-jfs/progress_checking
> partman-reiserfs/progress_checking
> partman-ext3/progress_checking

+ partman-xfs/progress_checking AFAICT
(and p-btrfs...)

> partman-ext3/create_failed

Still used in commit.d/format_ext3: 107-110.

> While these are used but could be switched to use the generic templates
> easily:
>
> partman-ext2r0/progress_checking
> partman-jfs/create_failed
> partman-reiserfs/create_failed
> partman-ext2r0/create_failed
> partman-xfs/create_failed
> partman-*/no_mount_point
> partman-*/specify_mountpoint

Have not checked these, but conversion sounds worthwhile.
AFAIK they should all depend on p-basicfilesystems.

Cheers,
FJP


Reply to: