Hi Frans, thanks for your feedback! On Montag, 11. Januar 2010, Frans Pop wrote: > Please file a proper BR against partman-auto-crypto. Will do. > The only acceptable implementation IMO would be to have it as an _optional_ > component (i.e. only loaded if explicitly requested by the user during > anna [1]), with a postinst that then takes care of setting the password. > The existing network-console udeb could provide inspiration. > > Also, the udeb would have to be very minimal: no deps on pam, adduser. Sounds all good to me :) > Feel free to file a wishlist BR. But unless you're willing to implement it > yourself I doubt that will achieve much. At least we can document the design now. > > Again: is this is a known+reported (and still existing in squeeze) bug? > It's not a "bug" by definition. At most a missing feature. Which is called a wishlist bug report :-) To me, "bugs" are mostly things to help tracking stuff. Whether this stuff is a missing or broken feature... cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.