Bug#188034: marked as done (umount -n option not working)
Your message dated Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:37:33 +0300
with message-id <4CFF51DD.4010105@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
and subject line Re: Bug#188034: umount -n option not working
has caused the Debian Bug report #188034,
regarding umount -n option not working
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
188034: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=188034
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: busybox
Version: 1:0.60.5-2
umount -n option is not working.
Example is pruned ('...')
# mount
...
/dev/VG01/LV04 on /tmp type ext3 (rw)
...
# cat /proc/mounts
...
/dev/VG01/LV04 /tmp ext3 rw 0 0
...
# busybox umount -n /tmp
BusyBox v0.60.5 (2002.10.31-09:35+0000) multi-call binary
Usage: umount [flags] FILESYSTEM|DIRECTORY
# cat /proc/mounts
...
/dev/VG01/LV04 /tmp ext3 rw 0 0
...
#
Gr. Sim
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Sim IJskes <sim@nyx.xs4all.nl>, 188034-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#188034: umount -n option not working
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
- Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:37:33 +0300
- Message-id: <4CFF51DD.4010105@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
- In-reply-to: <3E91A3DE.7070601@nyx.xs4all.nl>
- References: <3E91A3DE.7070601@nyx.xs4all.nl>
Version: 1:1.17.1-8
07.04.2003 20:14, Sim IJskes wrote:
> Package: busybox
> Version: 1:0.60.5-2
> # busybox umount -n /tmp
> BusyBox v0.60.5 (2002.10.31-09:35+0000) multi-call binary
>
> Usage: umount [flags] FILESYSTEM|DIRECTORY
The current version (1:1.17.1-8) in squeeze does not have this
defect anymore, umount -n works as expected.
So closing this bug now, after 7.5 years.
Thanks!
--- End Message ---
Reply to: