[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: busybox in SVN....



Quoting Otavio Salvador (otavio@ossystems.com.br):
> Hello Christian,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org> wrote:
> > I'm sorry but isn't it a little bit ridiculous that busybox, being
> > team-maintained, is still kept in people/waldi?
> >
> > No offense intended for Bastian, at all, but I would find
> > more logical to have it either in the trunk (like win32-loader) or in
> > packages/
> 
> Yes but since SVN is horrible to track history and like we opted to
> keep it there until we move to GIT.


Wouldn't an "svn copy" preserve all history?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: