Le lundi 27 septembre 2010 à 11:25 +0200, Fabian Greffrath a écrit : > Am 27.09.2010 09:04, schrieb Josselin Mouette: > > I’ve seen that (with both abiword and gnumeric), and I’ve seen the > > opposite too: documents that display fine in OOo but have everything > > messed up in abiword. > > Right, but is this really a good reason to keep both of them (i.e. > that they fail *differently* when attempting to open documents saved > in proprietary file formats)? > > I'd say, OOo is generally more "complete" than Abiword+Gnumeric. > People who know they want Abiword (e.g. because they want to use one > of its more advanced features that has no equivalent in OOo) also know > how to install it via apt. As I already explained a the beginning of the bug report, OOo integration with GNOME is a bad joke. The question is more: do we want an office suite that can open this or that document, or an office suite that is consistent and integrated correctly with the desktop? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `- […] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part