[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#497746: marked as done (Installation report)



Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:31 +0000
with message-id <E1OtBnr-0005mQ-Qs@ravel.debian.org>
and subject line Closing old installation report #497746
has caused the Debian Bug report #497746,
regarding Installation report
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
497746: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497746
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: NETISO
Image version: debian-LennyBeta2-amd64-netinst.iso from an official mirror though don't remember exact URL.
Date: 2008-08-20

Machine: Self-built desktop PC
Partitions:
Filesystem    Type    Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda8 reiserfs     45G   44G  1.8G  97% /
tmpfs        tmpfs    881M     0  881M   0% /lib/init/rw
udev         tmpfs     10M  100K   10M   1% /dev
tmpfs        tmpfs    881M     0  881M   0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda1  fuseblk     44G   26G   18G  60% /mnt/c
/dev/sda6     vfat     14G   11G  2.3G  83% /mnt/d
/dev/sda7     vfat     32G   32G  752M  98% /mnt/e

Though the installation was in sda2 (a partition of 15G) and now I moved it to sda8.

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:           [O]
Detect network card:    [O]
Configure network:      [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O]
User/password setup:    [O]
Install tasks:          [O]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Overall install:        [O]

Comments/Problems:

My girlfriend bought me this new machine with a 64 bits processor, so I wanted to try the 64 bits world instead of using my good old 32 bits Debian installation. On the boot prompt of the netinst CD, I selected "expert", with the good and trusty text based install instead of the graphical one. Everything was generally fine, some things needs improvements, read below. I have several partitions, I wanted to only format sda2 and just mount the others without formating, but I couldn't find the way to specify that with the installer! When I selected sda1 for example (my Windows Vista partition), I couldn't say that it was an NTFS partition and that I wanted to mount it in /mnt/c; the same with the other regular vfat partitions; so after install I had to edit the fstab file, but the installer should do that instead for comfort and specially for newbies. I selected the "low" priority on DebConf on the installer, but after the install, DebConf was configured with priority "medium" or "high" (don't remember exactly), so a dpkg-reconfigure debconf was necessary after the install; the installer should leave debconf with the priority that the user selected in the install process.
   If you are curious about something else let me know.
   Thanks for your hard work!

P.s.: now how is it possible that this machine has choppy sound with only a tiny bit of load? :-)

--
Ivan Baldo - ibaldo@adinet.com.uy - http://ibaldo.codigolibre.net/
From Montevideo, Uruguay, at the south of South America.
Freelance programmer and GNU/Linux system administrator, hire me!
Alternatives: ibaldo@codigolibre.net - http://go.to/ibaldo




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We are closing this installation report for one of the following
reasons:
- it was reported with a pre-lenny version of Debian
  Installer.
- indications in the installation report give the feeling that
  the reported problem waslying in another software, unrelated to
  D-I, which we can't easily identify.
- indications in the installation report suggest that it may have been
  fixed in a more recent version of a D-I component
- it was successful and we forgot closing it..:-)
- it has no information we consider useful


The D-I team is currently in the process of cleaning out the old spool
of installation reports that haven't bene processed yet. 

In case you think that the problem you reported has chances to be
still present, please reiterate your installation test with
a more recent image of D-I, if you're in position of doing this.

You'll find daily builds at
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer. We recommend you choose
the netboot image, in the "daily builds section", then choose to
install "squeeze" when prompted.

If some problems are found, please report them with a new bug sent
against installation-reports.

Many thanks for your understanding and your help improving Debian,
past and present.



--- End Message ---

Reply to: