[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#468779: marked as done (installation-reports: Install failed to recognize Intel Nineveh 82566DM adapter network on Econel 100 S2)



Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:29 +0000
with message-id <E1OtBnp-0005ha-Jr@ravel.debian.org>
and subject line Closing old installation report #468779
has caused the Debian Bug report #468779,
regarding installation-reports: Install failed to recognize Intel Nineveh 82566DM adapter network on Econel 100 S2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
468779: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468779
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal

Debian testing (downloaded Feb 28, 2008) failed to recognize the
network adapter Intel Nineveh 82566DM on a Fujitsu-Siemens Econel 100
S2 server. The hardware is described in ds_prim-econel-100-s2.pdf. 

Another network adapter cannot be used in the machine as it requires a
3,3 volt version said to be difficult to find. 

Apparently Intel knows about the problems, see
http://www.intel.com/support/network/sb/cs-009209.htm 

(The System Information below is not from the machine that couldn't be
installed) 
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-jp
Locale: LANG=en_DK, LC_CTYPE=en_DK (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We are closing this installation report for one of the following
reasons:
- it was reported with a pre-lenny version of Debian
  Installer.
- indications in the installation report give the feeling that
  the reported problem waslying in another software, unrelated to
  D-I, which we can't easily identify.
- indications in the installation report suggest that it may have been
  fixed in a more recent version of a D-I component
- it was successful and we forgot closing it..:-)
- it has no information we consider useful


The D-I team is currently in the process of cleaning out the old spool
of installation reports that haven't bene processed yet. 

In case you think that the problem you reported has chances to be
still present, please reiterate your installation test with
a more recent image of D-I, if you're in position of doing this.

You'll find daily builds at
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer. We recommend you choose
the netboot image, in the "daily builds section", then choose to
install "squeeze" when prompted.

If some problems are found, please report them with a new bug sent
against installation-reports.

Many thanks for your understanding and your help improving Debian,
past and present.



--- End Message ---

Reply to: