[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#395411: marked as done (debian-installer: [daily 20061026] fails to set up route + fails to see mirrors)



Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:19 +0000
with message-id <E1OtBnf-0005Ne-Pd@ravel.debian.org>
and subject line Closing old installation report #395411
has caused the Debian Bug report #395411,
regarding debian-installer: [daily 20061026] fails to set up route + fails to see mirrors
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
395411: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=395411
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-installer
Severity: critical
Justification: prevents install

Downloaded the daily etch netinst ISO image from
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso

Booted fine on a ThinkPad T42, detected CD drive and built-in 
Intel PRO/1000 net card.


Problem 1: DHCP gets the machine an IP address, but I get the
message:

"The network autoconfiguration was successful. However, no 
 default route was set ... Continue without a default route?"

This is strange, because if I continue installation selecting
'Yes', keeps hitting Enter (giving no name server, no domain
name, etc.), no network mirror, install from CD only,
install GRUB, and reboot the newly installed system, the route
is set fine:

"debian:~# route
 ...
 192.168.1.0  *            255.255.255.0  ...
 default      192.168.1.1  0.0.0.0        ..."

by the default configuration:

"debian:~# cat /etc/network/interfaces
 ...
 allow-hotplug eth0
 iface eth0 inet dhcp"


Problem 2: If I instead choose 'No', and configure the
network manually, choose any network mirror, the installer
tells me:

"The installer failed to access the mirror. ..."

But if I inspect VT4, I can see that what is tried is:

"wget -q http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/debian//dists/testing/main/binary-i386/Release -O -
 | grep Architecture"

If I do that from the VT3, it works fine.

I guess is missing a

"| cut -d' ' -f 2"

at the end?


Cheers,
/JP
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_DK, LC_CTYPE=en_DK (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We are closing this installation report for one of the following
reasons:
- it was reported with a pre-lenny version of Debian
  Installer.
- indications in the installation report give the feeling that
  the reported problem waslying in another software, unrelated to
  D-I, which we can't easily identify.
- indications in the installation report suggest that it may have been
  fixed in a more recent version of a D-I component
- it was successful and we forgot closing it..:-)
- it has no information we consider useful


The D-I team is currently in the process of cleaning out the old spool
of installation reports that haven't bene processed yet. 

In case you think that the problem you reported has chances to be
still present, please reiterate your installation test with
a more recent image of D-I, if you're in position of doing this.

You'll find daily builds at
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer. We recommend you choose
the netboot image, in the "daily builds section", then choose to
install "squeeze" when prompted.

If some problems are found, please report them with a new bug sent
against installation-reports.

Many thanks for your understanding and your help improving Debian,
past and present.



--- End Message ---

Reply to: