[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#360897: marked as done (sparc64 tftpboot kernel driver failure during Gigaswift ethernet (aka cassini) detection)



Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:12 +0000
with message-id <E1OtBnY-00058l-Gx@ravel.debian.org>
and subject line Closing old installation report #360897
has caused the Debian Bug report #360897,
regarding sparc64 tftpboot kernel driver failure during Gigaswift ethernet (aka cassini) detection
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
360897: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=360897
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ethernet-card-detection
Severity: critical

It is not possible to bring Gigaswift (aka Cassini) ethernet cards online and therefore continue installation on SunFire V440 (UltraSparc IIIi) when I use boot.img placed in the following directory of debian archives:

/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-sparc/current/images/sparc64/netboot/ 2.6/

The installation fails during network detection process with the following dump:

Apr 4 21:40:00 main-menu[2937]: DEBUG: configure ethernet-card- detection, status: 0 Apr 4 21:40:00 main-menu[2937]: DEBUG: virtual package ethernet-card- detection
Apr  4 21:40:00 kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
Apr  4 21:40:00 kernel: tsk->{mm,active_mm}->context = 00000000000001b6
Apr  4 21:40:00 kernel: tsk->{mm,active_mm}->pgd = fffff8133f65e000
Apr  4 21:40:00 kernel:               \|/ ____ \|/
Apr  4 21:40:00 kernel:               "@'/ .. \`@"
Apr  4 21:40:00 kernel:               /_| \__/ |_\
Apr  4 21:40:00 kernel:                  \__U_/
Apr  4 21:40:00 kernel: netcfg(7981): Oops [#1]
Apr 4 21:40:00 kernel: TSTATE: 0000009980009600 TPC: 0000000000412eb4 TNPC: 0000000000412eb8 Y: 00000000 Not tainted
Apr  4 21:40:00 kernel: TPC: <request_irq+0x14/0x2b8>
Apr 4 21:40:00 kernel: g0: fffff8133ecfc000 g1: fffff800006dd000 g2: 00000000000066d8 g3: fffff8133e2c13e0 Apr 4 21:40:00 kernel: g4: fffff8133d30b9c0 g5: 0000000000000000 g6: fffff8133e808000 g7: 00000000000066b8

The cards are recognized by the driver. Driver has explicitly mentioned that MAC address are not set in some kind of firmware memory (?)

Mentioned boot.img uses kernel 2.6.15-1, this bug was probably solved in 2.6.16, so this is something to be checked and boot.img file is to be updated.

I'm ready to test this problem again upon your request.

Karel Panek ( karel.panek@empyreum.com )
EMPYREUM Information Technologies




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We are closing this installation report for one of the following
reasons:
- it was reported with a pre-lenny version of Debian
  Installer.
- indications in the installation report give the feeling that
  the reported problem waslying in another software, unrelated to
  D-I, which we can't easily identify.
- indications in the installation report suggest that it may have been
  fixed in a more recent version of a D-I component
- it was successful and we forgot closing it..:-)
- it has no information we consider useful


The D-I team is currently in the process of cleaning out the old spool
of installation reports that haven't bene processed yet. 

In case you think that the problem you reported has chances to be
still present, please reiterate your installation test with
a more recent image of D-I, if you're in position of doing this.

You'll find daily builds at
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer. We recommend you choose
the netboot image, in the "daily builds section", then choose to
install "squeeze" when prompted.

If some problems are found, please report them with a new bug sent
against installation-reports.

Many thanks for your understanding and your help improving Debian,
past and present.



--- End Message ---

Reply to: