Bug#262293: marked as done (INSTALL REPORT)
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:42 +0000
with message-id <E1OtBo2-0006A7-FD@ravel.debian.org>
and subject line Closing old installation report #262293
has caused the Debian Bug report #262293,
regarding INSTALL REPORT
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact email@example.com
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact firstname.lastname@example.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: undisclosed-recipients:;
- Subject: INSTALL REPORT
- From: email@example.com (root)
- Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 21:37:44 +0800 (WST)
- Message-id: <20040731133744.5192C1BE2D@localhost.localdomain>
uname -a: Linux Pademelon 2.6.7-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:36:53 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date:Fri Jul 30 2004
Method: Network, tftp-PXE from LAN, ftp.wa.au.debian.org via proxy on LAN
Machine: HP PII Vectra VL509 mobo, BX chipset.
Processor:Pentium II (Deschutes) 334.189
Root Device: /dev/hda2
Root Size/partition table:
Pademelon:~# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda2 447M 178M 246M 42% /
tmpfs 31M 0 31M 0% /dev/shm
/dev/hda1 45M 11M 32M 26% /boot
Pademelon:~# fdisk -l /dev/hda
Disk /dev/hda: 3228 MB, 3228696576 bytes
128 heads, 63 sectors/track, 782 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 8064 * 512 = 4128768 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 1 12 48352+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda2 13 133 487872 83 Linux
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge (rev 02)
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge (rev 02)
0000:00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02)
0000:00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)
0000:00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01)
0000:00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02)
0000:00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] (rev 24)
0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G100 [Productiva] AGP (rev 02)
Pademelon:~# lspci -n
0000:00:00.0 0600: 8086:7190 (rev 02)
0000:00:01.0 0604: 8086:7191 (rev 02)
0000:00:07.0 0601: 8086:7110 (rev 02)
0000:00:07.1 0101: 8086:7111 (rev 01)
0000:00:07.2 0c03: 8086:7112 (rev 01)
0000:00:07.3 0680: 8086:7113 (rev 02)
0000:00:0b.0 0200: 10b7:9055 (rev 24)
0000:01:00.0 0300: 102b:1001 (rev 02)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [ ] None
Load installer modules: [E]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [ ] cfdisk is better
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
The installer downloaded stuff I don't need. Such as firewire support. I have no firewire.
Why do we have symlinks in / for initrd, kernel?
I really don't like the disk setup.
<Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments
and ideas you had during the initial install.>
I really don't want to waste time installing exim.
Install logs and other status info is available in /var/log/debian-installer/.
Do you want those?
Once you have filled out this report, mail it to firstname.lastname@example.org.
A firt bit of this info could be put in by the installer:
cat /etc/network/interfaces # shows how cards got configured
Oh, you could put a to: header at the top and a note on how to mail with "sendmail."
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We are closing this installation report for one of the following
- it was reported with a pre-lenny version of Debian
- indications in the installation report give the feeling that
the reported problem waslying in another software, unrelated to
D-I, which we can't easily identify.
- indications in the installation report suggest that it may have been
fixed in a more recent version of a D-I component
- it was successful and we forgot closing it..:-)
- it has no information we consider useful
The D-I team is currently in the process of cleaning out the old spool
of installation reports that haven't bene processed yet.
In case you think that the problem you reported has chances to be
still present, please reiterate your installation test with
a more recent image of D-I, if you're in position of doing this.
You'll find daily builds at
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer. We recommend you choose
the netboot image, in the "daily builds section", then choose to
install "squeeze" when prompted.
If some problems are found, please report them with a new bug sent
Many thanks for your understanding and your help improving Debian,
past and present.
--- End Message ---