[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#300870: marked as done (install report: Debian-Installer fails on old IBM PC)



Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:55 +0000
with message-id <E1OtBnH-0004Z3-Jp@ravel.debian.org>
and subject line Closing old installation report #300870
has caused the Debian Bug report #300870,
regarding install report: Debian-Installer fails on old IBM PC
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
300870: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=300870
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports

Of course, I do realize that this isn't exactly current hardware, but I
don't see why it shouldn't work anyway.

Debian-installer-version:
    boot floppy daily build of March 18th, from
    http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/floppy/

Method:
    boot from floppy, install packages from network

Machine:
    IBM Personal Computer 750 (PCI/ISA, not MicroChannel)
    chipset: INTEL PCIset SB82437JX + SB82371FB

Processor:
    Pentium-1 133MHz

Memory:
    48MB

Root Device:
    Quantum 540MB IDE hard disk

Partition table:
    Disk /dev/hda: 541 MB, 541384704 bytes
    255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 65 cylinders
    Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

       Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
    /dev/hda1   *           1          65      522081   83  Linux

    note: swap space is on separate drive, on secondary IDE bus

PCI devices:
    0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82437FX [Triton FX] (rev 01)
    0000:00:01.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371FB PIIX ISA [Triton I] (rev 02)
    0000:00:01.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371FB PIIX IDE [Triton I] (rev 02)
    0000:00:06.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905 100BaseTX [Boomerang]
    0000:00:08.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. 86c764/765 [Trio32/64/64V+] (rev 53)


Problems: reboot from hard disk fails

The installation was carried out with the current daily-build floppy
disks (boot, root, drivers), with everything else obtained through the
network. Everything proceeds smoothly until the reboot from hard disk.
GRUB loads the kernel and initrd image, apparently successfully. The
kernel runs through the bootup sequence without issue until it tries to
"Partition check" the hard drive. After making some comment about using
the PIIX module, and correctly recognizing the Quantum hard drive, it
then fails with a bunch of DMA timeout errors.

Since neither the install floppies, nor GRUB, nor "tomsrtbt" have any
problem at all with this hardware, I infer that it's a software problem.
Probably something about the right module not being loaded, or loaded in
the wrong order, or a conflict with another module. The installer chose
the "kernel-image-2.4.27-2-586tsc_2.4.27-8_i386.deb" kernel package; I
also tried the "kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386_2.4.27-8_i386.deb" kernel
package, but the result was the same.

Attached are the files "/linuxrc.conf", "/script", and "/loadmodules"
extracted from the initrd image "/boot/initrd.img-2.4.27-2-586tsc" found
on the hard disk after the failed reboot. The initrd package is
"initrd-tools_0.1.77_all.deb".

Any suggestions?


-- Ian Bruce
DELAY=0
BUSYBOX=
FSTYPES=ext3
IDE_CORE=ide-core
VERSION=0.1.77
ROOT=/dev/hda1
unload_unused_ide 'yes' pdc202xx_new adma100 aec62xx alim15x3 amd74xx atiixp cmd640 cmd64x cs5530 cy82c693 generic hpt34x hpt366 ns87415 opti621 pdc202xx_old piix rz1000 sc1200 serverworks siimage sis5513 slc90e66 triflex trm290 via82cxxx
modprobe -k  vesafb > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  fbcon 2> /dev/null
modprobe -k  unix 2> /dev/null
modprobe -k  pdc202xx_new > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  adma100 > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  aec62xx > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  alim15x3 > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  amd74xx > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  atiixp > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  cmd640 > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  cmd64x > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  cs5530 > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  cy82c693 > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  generic > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  hpt34x > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  hpt366 > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  ns87415 > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  opti621 > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  pdc202xx_old > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  piix > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  rz1000 > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  sc1200 > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  serverworks > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  siimage > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  sis5513 > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  slc90e66 > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  triflex > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  trm290 > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  via82cxxx > /dev/null 2>&1
modprobe -k  ide-detect
modprobe -k  ide-disk

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
We are closing this installation report for one of the following
reasons:
- it was reported with a pre-lenny version of Debian
  Installer.
- indications in the installation report give the feeling that
  the reported problem waslying in another software, unrelated to
  D-I, which we can't easily identify.
- indications in the installation report suggest that it may have been
  fixed in a more recent version of a D-I component
- it was successful and we forgot closing it..:-)
- it has no information we consider useful


The D-I team is currently in the process of cleaning out the old spool
of installation reports that haven't bene processed yet. 

In case you think that the problem you reported has chances to be
still present, please reiterate your installation test with
a more recent image of D-I, if you're in position of doing this.

You'll find daily builds at
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer. We recommend you choose
the netboot image, in the "daily builds section", then choose to
install "squeeze" when prompted.

If some problems are found, please report them with a new bug sent
against installation-reports.

Many thanks for your understanding and your help improving Debian,
past and present.



--- End Message ---

Reply to: