Re: Yet another [cross] installer
(Dropped private CCs)
On Monday 01 March 2010, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> * the binary-only kernel we're working with, they haven't even
> bothered to put in ext2,3 or 4
ext4 is enabled.
EXT4-fs warning: checktime reached, running e2fsck is recommended
EXT4 FS on mmcblk0p3, internal journal
EXT4-fs: recovery complete.
EXT4-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
EXT4-fs: file extents enabled
# grep ext4 /proc/filesystems
But yes, it's only msdox, vfat and ext4dev.
/me wonders if ext4 really was stable enough for this kind of usage back in