Quoting Otavio Salvador (otavio@debian.org): > 1. testing summary (http://merkel.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/testing-summary.html) > 2. building summary (http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/build-logs.html) > > It was make clear to RM team that we need to be able to fix the scripts > by ourselfs and I belive that it shouldn't be a problem. The testing-summary is obviously something that's entirely in the scope of the release team and running it as a release team tool makes perfect sense. The building summary is more something that's the duty of the D-I RM to monitor and is more clearly a "D-I tool". Still, having it run under a developer account is a small weakness (small because that developer is Joey whose reliability is very well known even though he doesn't participate so much to D-I development). As, the build status of D-I still affects the overall release, I think it would be a good move to have this run under the release team hat.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature