Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8

To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:01:42 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 200907201401.43256.elendil@planet.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 5a6cd4690907200445j3bdd9ad2xff2ef448d71ef9e7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 5a6cd4690907191703v3a6fdd11v6a8e6319a40342@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.62.0907201309220.22527@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <[🔎] 5a6cd4690907200445j3bdd9ad2xff2ef448d71ef9e7@mail.gmail.com>

On Monday 20 July 2009, Luca Favatella wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno told me that "route" is also needed, not only "ip".
> BusyBox "ip" + "route" should be the long term solution.

Unless I'm missing something 'ip' obsoletes both 'ifconfig' *and* 'route'.

ifconfig => ip addr, ip link
route => ip route

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8
  - From: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>

References:
- kFreeBSD progress report week 8
  - From: Luca Favatella <slackydeb@gmail.com>
- Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8
  - From: Petr Salinger <Petr.Salinger@seznam.cz>
- Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8
  - From: Luca Favatella <slackydeb@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] generalize rootskel
Next by Date: Processing of kernel-wedge_2.59_amd64.changes
Previous by thread: Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8
Next by thread: Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread