Re: WPA support in netcfg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Glenn Saberton <gsaberton@foomagic.org> writes:
>
>> Hello again,
>> Now that lenny has released, I am wondering what the d-i teams
>> intentions are regarding netcfg? I posted the WPA patches last year and
>> due to lenny being so close to release, they were understandably
>> refused. There was also some talk of scripting netcfg. Should I bother
>> posting them again or what is the general thoughts on wireless WPA
>> support in d-i moving forward?
>
> Yes, please do!
>
> I belive they'll apply just fine in current source since it hasn't
> change a lot since your last post.
>
Hi Otavio,
OK, i'll repost them again once I have had chance to test them with
2.6.28. Will likely be a little while until I can test it. Will report back.
Cheers
Glenn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkmijfMACgkQV8GyuTwyskMbGQCgkzk8H/yjfCFBuKIxcr3hRBYp
7TcAn3d7zTgOFX9SPpWhinkmTcQ5ap6l
=Q4Q9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: