Bug#513156: marked as done (s390-netdevice - qeth layer3 mode inoperable)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:17:05 +0000
with message-id <E1LRqcb-0005fl-RB@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#513156: fixed in s390-netdevice 0.0.21lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #513156,
regarding s390-netdevice - qeth layer3 mode inoperable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
513156: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513156
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: s390-netdevice
Version: 0.0.21
Severity: grave
The qeth layer3 mode is inoperable. The current kernels uses undefined
as default and this value needs to be written.
Bastian
--
All your people must learn before you can reach for the stars.
-- Kirk, "The Gamesters of Triskelion", stardate 3259.2
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: s390-netdevice
Source-Version: 0.0.21lenny1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
s390-netdevice, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
s390-netdevice_0.0.21lenny1.dsc
to pool/main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.21lenny1.dsc
s390-netdevice_0.0.21lenny1.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.21lenny1.tar.gz
s390-netdevice_0.0.21lenny1_s390.udeb
to pool/main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.21lenny1_s390.udeb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 513156@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> (supplier of updated s390-netdevice package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:03:31 +0100
Source: s390-netdevice
Binary: s390-netdevice
Architecture: source s390
Version: 0.0.21lenny1
Distribution: testing
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
Description:
s390-netdevice - Configure network hardware (udeb)
Closes: 513156
Changes:
s390-netdevice (0.0.21lenny1) testing; urgency=low
.
* Write layer2 attribute always. (closes: #513156)
* Don't longer try the ctc module, always use ctcm.
* Log some error conditions.
Checksums-Sha1:
6f6f762c594d6decc9855ab074e7ef6ef1adf8c5 1010 s390-netdevice_0.0.21lenny1.dsc
d1caa45fe11c0ac229e38b03456cfa49aabd6203 101218 s390-netdevice_0.0.21lenny1.tar.gz
47cd1e617e24e8973069a0b3d5b1b7577293bc34 86450 s390-netdevice_0.0.21lenny1_s390.udeb
Checksums-Sha256:
01c24cc2aa1fed705595d7ec2d29fb783cd5784f0ea8e08ea783714b4fb01ee4 1010 s390-netdevice_0.0.21lenny1.dsc
645e885c6b3fb187e8cff94b6b693b07febda6152587cf1afd0f01aafaa35eb0 101218 s390-netdevice_0.0.21lenny1.tar.gz
21b2ccea3bfed8428baba94a50cc7f1c5a50bd1e45fc053ec06da7a67f464e46 86450 s390-netdevice_0.0.21lenny1_s390.udeb
Files:
a99bf1de3789c743f581114f3cfe619d 1010 debian-installer standard s390-netdevice_0.0.21lenny1.dsc
05233f1cb11330c9111f9813805ff656 101218 debian-installer standard s390-netdevice_0.0.21lenny1.tar.gz
71b9381d5a94a00480b727b705542310 86450 debian-installer standard s390-netdevice_0.0.21lenny1_s390.udeb
Package-Type: udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkl/ML0ACgkQLkAIIn9ODhEYKACgnzkw6NEUb1oLlEqWRoisKeRL
m3cAoMzhlbgKHMSsB5ENRRlL/mhH2iIj
=4Hvi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: