Re: Different source packages producing the same binaries in different architectures makes dak unhappy
* Martin Michlmayr [Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:13:09 +0100]:
> * Adeodato Simó <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2008-11-06 15:47]:
> > I think it's clear that the cruft tool should be patched not to propose
> > removal of such source packages, but although ftpmaster is open to
> > patches, somebody has to produce them. Because of this, I'm asking: is
> > there a technical reason that mandates to have split source packages for
> > linux-modules-di between arm and armel? Would it be appropriate to merge
> > the two?
> I just talked to ftpmaster about this again to discsus a possible
> workaround (adding a binary package to armel, but not to the arm
> package). But they told me that they're aware of the problem and
> don't run the cruft remover on linux-modules-di-arm until the bug in
> the cruft tool is fixed.
> So it seems we don't have to change the linux-modules-di package at
Ok, thanks for following-up to this, Martin.
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
A hacker does for love what other would not do for money.