Bug#504095: installation-report: xen paravirt installation
- To: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>, 504095@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#504095: installation-report: xen paravirt installation
- From: Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:20:58 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20081121152058.GA11558@bogon.ms20.nix>
- Reply-to: Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>, 504095@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <1225470736.12607.614.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
- References: <20081031115818.GA4628@bogon.ms20.nix> <1225457808.12607.550.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1225459568.12607.566.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20081031153100.GA5643@bogon.ms20.nix> <20081031162222.GA3033@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <1225470736.12607.614.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Hi Ian,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 04:32:16PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:22 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 04:31:00PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> > > So to me it seems the workaround can be removed:
> > > * removed for VIA Ester altogeher
> > > * removed vor VIA Nehemiah once we ship 2.6.27
> >
> > Please read #464962 first.
>
> OK, so I think the upshot of that long thread is that kernel 2.6.26-8
> removed the long nops so even the Nehemiah chips can go back to using
> 686 kernels and we should just revert svn r55059 altogether.
This is unfixed in RC1. Is there a problelm in reverting r55059 or has
this just been forgotten? Anything I can help with?
Cheers,
-- Guido
Reply to: