On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 06:59:45AM +0000, Christian Perrier wrote: > localechooser 2.04 fixes a few things for D-I but that should normally > be included as part of a normal D-I release. > > *However*, it also drops the need for iso-codes-udeb and will > therefore make the need for that udeb useless, which would in turn > simplify the work of iso-codes maintainers (see recent unblock request > by Tobias). > > When I discussed that with him in mid-July, Frans Pop agreed that the > best way to fix this was uploading localechooser 2.04 and have it > enter testing so that an iso-codes package without the udeb can be > uploaded to unstable and then enter testing. > > So, technically speaking, that was prepared before the > freeze..:-)...However, for this to happen, we needed to: > > - have iso-codes enter testing (it contains several important changes > in lists and translations and iso-codes maintainers wanted to secure > them out) > - have localechooser enter testing > - build a new iso-codes without the udeb > - have it enter testing > > So, now I think we should request for 2). If the D-I RM agrees, could > localechooser be hinted for testing, please? I'd like to have the d-i people opinion on the disruptiveness of that first. Not building an udeb for iso-codes now that it's unblocked for testing would be fine. If i'm correct localechooser is mostly (if not only) used during d-i, so d-i people opinion matters more than ours. I will follow them on this. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpq7PPkeXdi3.pgp
Description: PGP signature