[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#497675: partconf: FTBFS in lenny: Nonexistent build-dependency: libparted1.7-dev



Package: partconf
Version: 1.26
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080903 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in a lenny chroot, your package failed
to build on i386.

Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 5.0.22), libdebconfclient0-dev (>= 0.47), libparted1.7-dev (>= 1.7.1-1), po-debconf (>= 0.5.3), libdebian-installer4-dev (>= 0.41)
> Checking for already installed source dependencies...
> W: Unable to locate package libparted1.7-dev
> debhelper: missing
> Using default version 7.0.15
> libdebconfclient0-dev: missing
> Using default version 0.131
> libparted1.7-dev: missing
> Default version of libparted1.7-dev not sufficient, no suitable version found. Skipping for now, maybe there are alternatives.
> po-debconf: missing
> Using default version 1.0.15
> libdebian-installer4-dev: missing
> Using default version 0.58
> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> E: Couldn't find package libparted1.7-dev

The full build log is available from:
   http://newpeople.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2008/09/03

It is possible that your package builds fine in sid, but you should make sure
that your package also builds fine in lenny before the release.

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment.  Internet was not accessible from the build systems.

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



Reply to: