On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > Other problem related to rescue mode: a shell gets executed without any > warning just before rescue mode (possibly because the wrong position in > the menu). > Also, the informational message before entering the rescue shell is a > lot less informational than the one for a normal shell. It misses the > info on how to exit for example. Why not reuse the message shown by the > existing rescue shell? The second part is confusion on my part because of the fact that a regular shell gets run before rescue is actually started. Fact remains though that rescue mode displays a lot less informational message than the normal shell. IMO the rescue mode message should be based on the normal one with the needed extra info about the chroot merged in.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.