On Saturday 12 July 2008, Davide Viti wrote: > I think you mean u210 [...] > I changed the stripping rule (for mono) as to strip all but u0..u210 No. This strips more than I intended. The Cyrillic and Latin Extended sets for example should IMO remain included. I really meant u2100: Letterlike symbols and higher. I'm aware that makes the savings a _lot_ less, but all small bits help in D-I. Also means that Jérémy will have to redo his numbers :-) Unless of course others feel that we really should strip down this much. Guess now that we have the extra-reduced udeb a comparison of the difference between the two makes sense, for example in Greek or Russian, when reading the syslog (which _does_ contain translated text) in nano. I would expect the quality loss to be significant and thus worth the cost. Jérémy: could you do that compare maybe?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.