[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: non-free firmware

On Friday 20 June 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> > We probably do still need to make sure
> > - if we install firmware from a package that licence requirements are
> > met (e.g. display a debconf message included in the package)
> What's an example of a package that needs to do this?

No idea if there are any ATM, but I can imagine it could happen and be 
part of the deb's postinst. I do know we have some other (non-firmware) 
packages in non-free that do this.

Kernel team would know I guess.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: