Re: r53435 - in trunk/installer: build/config build/config/amd64 build/config/amd64/cdrom build/config/amd64/hd-media build/config/i386 build/config/i386/cdrom build/config/i386/hd-media build/config/powerpc/powerpc build/config/powerpc/powerpc64 debian
- To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: r53435 - in trunk/installer: build/config build/config/amd64 build/config/amd64/cdrom build/config/amd64/hd-media build/config/i386 build/config/i386/cdrom build/config/i386/hd-media build/config/powerpc/powerpc build/config/powerpc/powerpc64 debian
- From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 00:22:08 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 200805200022.18523.elendil@planet.nl>
- In-reply-to: <E1JyDF6-0003aT-Mg@alioth.debian.org>
- References: <E1JyDF6-0003aT-Mg@alioth.debian.org>
On Monday 19 May 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> +# All images that include cdebconf should include symbols needed by these
> +# plugins.
> +EXTRAUDEBS=cdebconf-newt-entropy cdebconf-text-entropy cdebconf-gtk-entropy
I wonder if it would not be better to use "+=" for this:
+EXTRAUDEBS += cdebconf-gtk-entropy
Wouldn't that be more flexible in case additional UDEBS need to be added
either in common or for other reasons?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Reply to: