Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2008 11:14:33 -0400 with message-id <20080516151432.GA30630@kodama.kitenet.net> and subject line Re: Bug#480998: some debootstrap variants fail when run under sudo has caused the Debian Bug report #480998, regarding some debootstrap variants fail when run under sudo to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 480998: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=480998 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: some debootstrap variants fail when run under sudo
- From: "Todd A. Jacobs" <tjacobs-kw-reportbug.e56379@codegnome.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 18:08:48 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20080513010848.2753.85851.reportbug@deltani.codegnome.org>
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.8 Severity: important Some of the variants fail when run using sudo, instead of when logged in as root. In particular, buildd and the standard install will fail, while minbase will succeed. $ sudo debootstrap --arch=i386 --variant=buildd --include=sudo,locales,less sid sid-build-ia32 http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ I: Retrieving Release I: Retrieving Packages I: Validating Packages I: Resolving dependencies of required packages... I: Resolving dependencies of base packages... I: Found additional base dependencies: bzip2 cpp-4.2 debian-archive-keyring g++-4.2 gcc-4.2 gnupg gpgv libbz2-1.0 libgcrypt11 libgdbm3 libgnutls26 libgpg-error0 libldap-2.4-2 libopencdk10 libreadline5 libsasl2-2 libstdc++6-4.2-dev libtasn1-3 libtimedate-perl libusb-0.1-4 linux-libc-dev lzma readline-common I: Checking component main on http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian... [snip] I: Configuring libopencdk10... I: Configuring libgnutls26... I: Configuring libldap-2.4-2... I: Configuring gnupg... I: Configuring debian-archive-keyring... I: Configuring apt... I: Configuring g++-4.2... I: Configuring g++... I: Configuring libstdc++6-4.2-dev... W: Failure while configuring base packages. W: Failure while configuring base packages. W: Failure while configuring base packages. W: Failure while configuring base packages. W: Failure while configuring base packages. Note that if the user is root, rather than a mortal using sudo, the same commands succeed. This obviously shouldn't be the case. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'stable'), (550, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages debootstrap depends on: ii binutils 2.18.1~cvs20080103-4+b1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii wget 1.11.1-1 retrieves files from the web debootstrap recommends no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 480998-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#480998: some debootstrap variants fail when run under sudo
- From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:14:33 -0400
- Message-id: <20080516151432.GA30630@kodama.kitenet.net>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080516074949.GD7559@penguin.codegnome.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20080513010848.2753.85851.reportbug@deltani.codegnome.org> <[🔎] 20080514192200.GA25653@kodama.kitenet.net> <[🔎] 20080516074949.GD7559@penguin.codegnome.org>
Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:22:00PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > > I'd need to see your debootstrap.log to make any guesses about what is > > If/when it fails again, I'll attach one. In the meantime, switching from > mirrors.kernel.org to ftp.us.debian.org has cleared up the problem, but > does that mean that debootstrap may fail inexplicably if there's a > problem with the repository? Yes, of course. If the repository is broken, the debs on it can fail to install. -- see shy joAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---