On Thursday 08 May 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: > I've done a mass upload of packages with translation-only > updates. There're still some that needs upload and I'd like to ask for > help from porters for it. They're: > > s390/s390-dasd > s390/s390-netdevice > s390/zipl-installer There is no need to upload these as translations are not used on s390. > sparc/silo-installer Not needed as the changed translations are graphical installer only. > partman/partman-palo I'll take care of this one, although it's extremely low urgency. > win32-loader An extra upload just for a single language? We _are_ talking about a beta release here you know... > We still have a lot of packages with changes in svn that are not > uploaded. It would be nice if porters could take a look and upload the > updated packages. I'll do a general look once I wake up to see what I > can upload (it's a bit late here). Components with real code changes that should still be uploaded: - aboot-installer (definitely!) - glantank, flash-kernel (maybe) - installation-report (nice to have) - kbd-chooser (I'll do that) - localechooser - lowmem - netcfg - nobootloader - os-prober - partman-basicfilesystems - partman-md - partman-multipath (although AFAIK this is not yet ready for use) - partman-partitioning - rootskel-gtk (I'll do that) A lot of the others have just the Uploaders cleanup pending, so should be safe to upload anyway. > Jeremy, please add the workaround for the cairo issue and, if you can, > upload cdebconf (or I do that after you adds it). This should be done in rootskel-gtk, so I will take care of this. However, I would first like to know what the result was of your discussion with the cairo maintainers. IIRC you promised to contact them to see if they could do a revert. Please inform the rest of the team of such things! I would also very much like to see the patch from Jérémy for cdebconf-entropy for #479325 included in beta2. Preferably the last remaining issues I noted should also be fixed, but if Jérémy is unavailable in time his current patch should definitely be included. Cheers, FJP
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.