[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#444825: marked as done (Upgrade busybox ?)

Your message dated Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:24:00 +0100
with message-id <200803241324.02688.thijs@debian.org>
and subject line new upstream uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #444825,
regarding Upgrade busybox ?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
444825: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=444825
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.1.3-5
Severity: wishlist

    Is there a good reason not to upgrade busybox to the latest version ?

    I've compiled svn version 20150 with the same applets plus eject, fdflush,
  fdformat, fdisk, halt, insmod, lsmod, mkswap, poweroff, reboot, rmmod
  and the total is 5448 bytes smaller on AMD64 (514088 instead of 519536).
  The applets are more complete in the recent versions, the only thing that
  disapperead are the e2fs utils which are not compiled in anyway.

    Full disclosure: I have a vested interest in the upgrade (I use ubuntu as
  "portable linux" and the recent busybox allows for a smaller initrd, and
  Ubuntu would consider the upgrade more easily if it were first tested in
  Debian !).

     Thank you,

          Loïc Grenié

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1:1.9.2-1

Hi,

A new upstream version of busybox has been uploaded recently, thereby solving 
your request for such an upgrade.


cheers,
Thijs

Attachment: pgpGR7Ij7h2iF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: