On Monday 28 January 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > I've taken the byhand-tag script as basis, but basically written the > logic from scratch. I've included as many sanity checks as I could think > of. Let me know if you feel anything is missing. One comment for the D-I team... I've included a fairly strict check of allowed version numbers, based on what we've used in the past. This is mainly because we don't want really weird versions ending up as directory names on the mirrors. The following formats are allowed: - YYYYMMDD : regular upload to unstable (e.g. 20080128) - YYYYMMDD\.[0-9]+ : 2nd upload to unstable on same day (20080128.1) - YYYYMMDD[a-z]+[0-9]+ : uploads to (old)stable (20070308etch2) The check for the first 8 chars is not really for valid dates, but just for eight digits. I don't think we need any more variants, do we? The scheme does not support NMUs or binNMUs, but it seems like a good idea that they _not_ be processed automatically (as I'm also not sure we really want them anyway).
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.