[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#454493: Display PCI slot for nics, if available



dann frazier <dannf@dannf.org> writes:

<...>
> In fact, as to Otavio's point, it probably makes sense to do the
> module loading outside of hw-detect (e.g. his acpi-support-udeb
> suggestion), and just let hw-detect use the interface if its
> available.

Yes, I think it's starting to makes sense to have something like that
and put all this in one cannonical place. Does someone objects if I
start to prepare this udeb for review?

<...>
>> We've had other requests to provide additional identification of NICs (see 
>> #450605 and merged BRs) and so far we (or at least I) have been thinking of 
>> some way to display the MAC address, possibly by allowing to switch between 
>> display of the current descriptions and MAC address.
>
> That would help some users, but I'd like to see us find a more general
> way to display all the available information that a user might use for
> identification. And I expect a separate display, or "view" for each
> may prove not to scale.
>
> I do like the genearl principle of Geert's proposal:
>
>  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=450605#31
>
> With the exception that I don't like splitting the option list from
> the selection widget (and as Bastian points out, its not possible
> anyway).
>
> Some brainstorming:
>  * Modify cdebconf to permit per-option descriptions, and use those
>    descriptions to provide details about each nic. Frontends could
>    use this to implement a "more info" button, or just include the
>    description text in-line.
>  * Modify cdebconf to support multi-line choice fields. Make each
>    interface choice be a multi-lined option that includes things like
>    vendor, model, mac, slot.
>  * Change the flow from "select iface" -> "configure iface" to:
>                      "select iface"
>                            v
>                "display info about iface & confirm"
>                            v
>                    "configure iface"
>    This is probably the only one possible w/ today's cdebconf, but its
>    pretty non-intuitive.

I personaly like the description idea since it looks to be more
suitable for the way we have the dialogs now. Others?

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."




Reply to: