Quoting Joey Hess (joeyh@debian.org): > Since lilo-installer is licensed under the GPL version 2 or later, I > suggest it's sanest for elilo-installer to have the same license. I > place my modifications to it under this license. Could the listed > people please respond with a similar statement? It's fine by me to use a "GPL versioN 2 or later" license.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature