[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Lenny proposal: may the g-i look be similar to the desktop look



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/03/2007 04:47 PM, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 1/3/07, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) <felipe@cathedrallabs.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 01/03/2007 10:32 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> > Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> writes:
>> >> On Wednesday 03 January 2007 12:45, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>I love the simple and easy-to-use of g-i, but it would be even better
>> >>>if it looked similar the the log-in and the desktop.
>> >>
>> >>OTOH, the default desktop has a blue theme and the uses Debian red...
>> >>For me personally at least, staying with red is important.
>> >
>> > Why do you think the red, on installer, is so important? The logo will
>> > be the same and since we're using the blue theme on the installed
>> > system I personally do not see any problem in having it being use on
>> > g-i too.
>>
>>         AFAIK, the Debian Desktop people have the clear idea of work
>> since the beginning of the development cycle to produce a new look
>> for Lenny and I don't see why they can't integrate g-i in the pack
>> and also follow Frans idea to keep the installer "red", designers
>> can achieve that, which means keep the "feeling" and still use
>> different colors for that. :-)
> 
> First, it was never about the colors alone. 
[...]

	Sorry if sounds like that, it was not my intetion while
writing the paragraph. My idea is to let clear that managing colors
is also one of the points in working to have the same "look & feel".

	Kind regards,

- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFnAkUCjAO0JDlykYRAqtVAJ4uHECWL6bDviUqU9k344t6LblIVQCeJtKk
7uGLdPrOhsxQweGaBPGP1bY=
=EzpF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: