[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#452388: "Standard system" is confusing



Quoting Joey Hess (joeyh@debian.org):
> Eddy Petri?or wrote:
> > > -Description: Standard system
> > > +Description: Command-line environment
> > 
> > I agree with Robert; I have been asked quite a few times by friends (while
> > installing, what is the difference between standard and desktop system). This
> > change would make it a lot clearer what's what.
> 
> Resulting in people de-selecting standard if they choose desktop. Which
> is not what we want.

You get a point here.

> 
> Anyway, the description is not accurate. Standard includes everything
> from documentation about Debian to a MTA to core localisation support,
> to core SE linux support, to a portmapper (for NFS mounts), none of
> which has much to do with the command line.


Sure, describing this as "command-line" is certainly restirctive but
we might need to focus on what we want to day:

- this task should be installed on nearly any system except those that
  are really short on disk space
- it does not bring a graphical environment

Anyone seeing something else to add that would describe the standard
system?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: