Re: elilo-installer copyright status
- To: Peter Rock <gnuosphere@gmail.com>, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, dannf@debian.org, bdale@debian.org, rhirst@debian.org, Jim Lieb <lieb@wildopensource.com>, bubulle@debian.org
- Subject: Re: elilo-installer copyright status
- From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:43:06 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20070929124306.GA27347@riva.ucam.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Peter Rock <gnuosphere@gmail.com>, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, dannf@debian.org, bdale@debian.org, rhirst@debian.org, Jim Lieb <lieb@wildopensource.com>, bubulle@debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070929074119.GS13244@riva.ucam.org>
- References: <[🔎] c684553f0709282046pb22882fw286d1a03c0be9516@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20070929070836.GA28912@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 20070929074119.GS13244@riva.ucam.org>
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 08:41:19AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 03:08:36AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Since lilo-installer is licensed under the GPL version 2 or later, I
> > suggest it's sanest for elilo-installer to have the same license. I
> > place my modifications to it under this license. Could the listed
> > people please respond with a similar statement?
>
> I have no problem with applying GPLv2-or-later to any of my changes to
> silo-installer, past or future.
And FWIW I meant elilo-installer there ...
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@debian.org]
Reply to: