Bug#414190: marked as done (cdebconf-gtk-udeb: Selected text for checkboxes dissapears.)
Your message dated Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:01:56 +0200
with message-id <467FAEB4.9000902@gmail.com>
and subject line Closing this bug because not reproducible
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: cdebconf-gtk-udeb: Selected text for checkboxes dissapears.
- From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
- Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 20:29:51 +0100
- Message-id: <20070309192951.GA16185@roeckx.be>
Package: cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Version: 0.113
Hi,
I was using the debian-testing-i386-kde-CD-1.iso from
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/ from
05-Mar-2007. I assume it has either version 0.113 or 0.114 of
cdebconf-gtk-udeb in it, not sure.
When I came to the point where xserver-xorg gets configured, it asks
which resolutions you want to have. This is a list of checkboxes.
When clicking on one of the lines the text seems to be dissapearing. I
think it's changing the background so you know you clicked on it, but it
doesn't put any text in it. You only get to see a little square.
Kurt
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I wasn't able to reproduce this bug with Etch nor with trunk installer
and i strongly suspect the problem was due to the use of an old
installer image.
Moreover, the problem causing the checkboxes to disappear was fixed
upstream in cairo recently, so even if clearlooks should fail, this bug
should no longer show up anyway.
Hence, i'm closing this bug.
regards
Attilio Fiandrotti
--- End Message ---
Reply to: