The following comes from discussions in dle when we proofread the
debconf templates and package description of udev.
James suggests that packages prodicing udebs should add a comment
explaining that udebs should not be installed on normal systems. What
do you think of this proposal?
Please keep both lists CC'ed
----- Forwarded message from James Westby <jw+debian@jameswestby.net> -----
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:18:32 +0100
From: James Westby <jw+debian@jameswestby.net>
To: debian-l10n-english@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [RFR] templates://udev/{udev.templates}
X-Mailing-List: <debian-l10n-english@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/858
X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE (4.2507) This message is 'unsure'; please train it!
On (12/04/07 13:05), Christian Perrier wrote:
> Please find, for review, the debconf templates of udev.
>
> - the hotplug package and requires a kernel not older than 2.6.12.
> + the hotplug package and requires a 2.6.12 or later kernel.
I think it should be "requires a version 2.6.12 or later kernel"
> .
> This is a minimal version for use in debian-installer.
>
Should we start adding "This package should not be installed on a normal
system" to udebs?
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby -- GPG Key ID: B577FE13 -- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-l10n-english-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
** CRM114 Whitelisted by: debian-l10n-english@lists.debian.org **
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature