[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#382889: marked as done (debian-installer: non-optimal order of operations)

Your message dated Fri, 13 Apr 2007 16:16:40 -0400
with message-id <20070413201640.GA20397@kitenet.net>
and subject line Bug#382889: closed by Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> (Closing bug as we don't intend to change the order of questions)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal

one of the biggest qualms with the windows installer is that various
dialogs pop up dispersed throughout the installation, forcing the user
to constantly attend to the system (merely to hit "next" when the 
appropriate time comes).

it appears to me that the debian-installer suffers this usability
concern as well.  for example, user set up and configuration comes after
disk partioning (which can take a reasonble amount of time especially
ext3 on large disks).  if user set up were before disk partitioning,
then the user would not need to wait as the installer could continue
directly into package download and installation.

i suggest that some time be spent considering the installation order of
operations, and making sure that the user is not being forced to attend
the system unnecessarily.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> reopen 382889
> thanks
> >Subject: Closing bug as we don't intend to change the order of questions
> >After the discussion that happened in this bug's log, it is clear that
> >the D-I team has no intent to change the order of questions in the
> >installation process.
> >
> >The user setup comes after the partitioning step, and moving its
> >questions elsewhere would mean moving the clock setup questions as
> >well, which is technically not possible before the disk is
> >partitioned.
> why can't this information be stored in ram until disk partitioning
> finishes, then transfered to the right location on disk?

Because the clock setup step depends on os-prober, which depends on the
disk having already been partitioned so that it can detect which other
operating systems are still installed.

see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--- End Message ---

Reply to: