[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#411943: partman-lvm: inconsistent usage of unit symbols for decimal and binary multiples



On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:51:58 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:

> On Thursday 22 February 2007 01:17, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I set the severity of this bug to "important" bug, since it has a
> > major effect on the usability of a package, but I strongly believe
> > that etch debian-installer should *not* be released with such a
> > usability issue.
> 
> This issue has been in partman for quite some time. There's absolutely
> no  reason to consider it anything than a cosmetic issue.

I'm sorry, but I have to strongly disagree.
Creating the graphical installer was useful to solve a cosmetic issue.
This is instead a usability issue: user interface consistency is one
of the key principles of usability.  When the user asks for a value
and gets another one, just because the same symbol is used with
different
meanings on input and output, he/she gets heavily confused and goes
away telling other people that Debian is too hard to install...

Believe me, I lost almost half an evening in trying to understand
what was going on, before I figured out that "MB" was being used with
two different meanings on input and output.
And I consider myself as an informed user, especially on unit of
measurement issues...

> We'll look at this at our leasure after Etch has been released.
> Leaving  severity at important, even though you could just as well
> argue for  minor.

I could argue for grave, IMHO.

> 
> Your testing and feedback is appreciated, but we're not going to delay
> the  release or hazard the stability of the code we have now by making
> rash  changes to fix this.

As I said, I think that this is something that should really be fixed
*before* etch is out.  It's well known that Debian releases when it's
ready: I don't think that partman in the current status is actually
ready.


-- 
 http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html
 Need to refresh your keyring in a piecewise fashion?
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgptsIMFHR8zk.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: