On Thursday 21 December 2006 18:36, Eddy Petrișor wrote: > The reason I placed it in there was that it seemed the most appropriate > place since that is finish-install info. Do you think that > /usr/lib/ppp-udeb/ is a better place? > > If the fact that the script is in /usr/lib/finish-install.d/ is the > problem, of course, this can be changed, since the script is harmless, > I didn't thought it would be a problem. <eddyp> fjp: I have sent an email about that sourced script <eddyp> I wasn't sure either which was the best way <eddyp> if the sourced "script" is not +x is that ok? or do you prefer the /usr/lib/ppp-udeb/solution? <eddyp> s:ppp-udeb/:ppp-udeb/ : <fjp> finish-install.d should only contain actual scripts that should be run during finish-install, and nothing else. Note that what you were putting into finish-install.d is _not_ a script... <eddyp> fjp: as I said in the mail, the script is harmless ... that's why I thought it would be fine <fjp> Why don't you set that value in debconf, if you need to retrieve it later? <fjp> eddyp: Dumping cruft in a runparts directory is never OK. <eddyp> finish-install.d has debconf available? <fjp> Of course. <eddyp> I wasn't aware of that <eddyp> ok, that is nice <fjp> Look at other scripts in finish-install.d...
Attachment:
pgpKrpOPgB7VC.pgp
Description: PGP signature