Bug#402482: RC?
* Frans Pop (elendil@planet.nl) [061220 14:42]:
> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 08:35, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I have yet to see the dataloss. Anyways, bugs being important doesn't
> > mean they are not allowed to be fixed (and I would let such an fix
> > still to Etch currently), but I don't think we should wait on the fix.
> > So I'm downgrading to important.
>
> The dataloss is there, though not in the conventional sense: the file
> itself is correct, but using busybox zcat or gunzip only part of it is
> extracted so from a user PoV data is "lost".
>
> Then why not leave it at RC and tag it etchignore. IMO that would better
> fit this issue.
If you want, you can do it (IOW, this is a direct approval of using
etch-ignore by you in this case).
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: