Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 17:20:55 +0900 with message-id <20061105082056.1DFB51A78DA@mail.topstudio.co.jp> and subject line Bug#394140: installation-reports: missing Chinese glyphs in GTK installer has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: installation-reports: missing Chinese glyphs in GTK installer
- From: Ming Hua <minghua@rice.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:42:53 -0500
- Message-id: <20061020014253.6371.59566.reportbug@danube.mems.rice.edu>
Package: installation-reports Severity: normal I just tested the daily netinstall i386 CD, downloaded from http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd with md5sum 62a96d420dea74f0a214571c6de4f5c1. The Chinese (both simplified and traditional) display in the GTK installer is completely broken. Many glyphs are missing, and shown just as boxes with the unicode number in it. This can be easily seen in the "Choose Language" step, as both simplified Chinese and traditional Chinese entry have one glyph missing. Japanese and Korean don't seem to be affected. The text-mode installer for Chinese is also okay. Ming 2006.10.19
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 394140-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#394140: installation-reports: missing Chinese glyphs in GTK installer
- From: Kenshi Muto <kmuto@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 17:20:55 +0900
- Message-id: <20061105082056.1DFB51A78DA@mail.topstudio.co.jp>
- In-reply-to: <20061021005403.GA9778@danube.mems.rice.edu>
- References: <20061020014253.6371.59566.reportbug@danube.mems.rice.edu> <200610201635.31574.elendil@planet.nl> <20061021005403.GA9778@danube.mems.rice.edu>
Version: 1.8 thanks Hi boot team, At 21 Oct 06 00:54:03 GMT, Ming Hua wrote: > I agree with the theory about font switching. In the 20060911 > screenshots, Japanese is using inconsistent fonts, and Chinese is using > a consistent font. In the 20060921 screenshots, Japanese's font is > consistent now (but a different one than that Chinese used), and Chinese > is using a new font the one as the one Japanese is using now, and some > glyphs are missing. I assume these glyphs just don't exist in the new > Japanese-favored font, and the old Chinese-favored font somehow doesn't > get loaded. I'm sorry but I noticed my build script had a problem for Chinese font. Fixed version 1.8 has already been uploaded and merged into testing and rc1. Thanks, -- Kenshi Muto kmuto@debian.org
--- End Message ---