On Thursday 26 October 2006 21:04, Sven Luther wrote: > Ok, Frans, please step back into reality. > > I filled a correct patch back then, which i had tested and everything. > This patch did not get applied, but modified slightly by Colin or you > or whoever, which resulted in d-i being utterly broken on pegasos. And > then you speak like this to me ? > > And to add to this the other patches which completed the hypervisor > serial ports in finish-install, which i loast because of the conflict > caused by not having my patches commited, but merged with a slight > difference and with a untimely delay, causing a big mess in my checked > out version, and you then later reproaching me that i did not send it. > > Furthermore, my attitude has been more than correct with you and the > d-i team since at least the starting of september, and you have > yourself indulged at least four-five times, in practices against me > which are the exact echo of what was reproached against me back then. Bla, bla, bla and fuck you too. This still does not answer why your current patch is broken. When I replied I only looked at this current one BR, and not at the entire history. In this current BR you have made three basic mistakes: - you have combined unrelated patches in one BR - you have changed the patch _after_ it was already applied and the BR closed - both patches had fairly basic errors in them (and you don't even admit to the second error) Sorry if I'm not impressed.
Attachment:
pgpAHpUuYWGZM.pgp
Description: PGP signature